Tag Archives: Adventure & Dual-Sport Motorcycles

Requiem for the Kawasaki KLR650 (1987-2018)

With its original livery reflecting the style of the late ’80s, the 1987 Kawasaki KLR650 looked like a big dirt bike but was also good on the street and on long-distance tours. (Photo courtesy Kawasaki)

Here we are, at the beginning of a new year and the end of an era. After a 32-year run (1987-2018), Kawasaki has ceased production of the KLR650. After tens of thousands of units sold and millions of miles ridden around the globe, the legendary dual-sport has been retired. A victim of ever-tightening emissions regulations, the KLR and its lone carburetor are being put out to pasture.

In its early days Kawasaki billed the KLR not as a dual-sport but as a “triple-sport,” a motorcycle good for street, dirt and touring. That aligned perfectly with Rider’s focus on touring, travel and adventure, and since the KLR has always been reasonably priced, even more so when purchased used, it also fit within the limited budgets of staffers and contributors. Editor-in-Chief Mark Tuttle, Managing Editor Jenny Smith and Senior Editor Yours Truly have owned, and loved, KLRs. And long-time dual-sport contributor Arden Kysely owned not one but two KLRs, racking up more than 65,000 miles.

1987 Kawasaki KLR650 brochure
Brochure for the 1987 Kawasaki KLR650.

In the October 2013 issue of Rider, Clement Salvadori wrote his Retrospective column about the 1993-1996 Kawasaki KLX650, a more powerful, more off-road-oriented spin-off of the KLR, and he summed up the icon’s early history:

“On the conservative end was the venerable KLR650, which began life as a 600 in 1984 and showed a very modern approach to dual-sporting as it had the first liquid-cooled engine, with a kickstarter and a smallish gas tank holding just three gallons. For 1985, the engine-starting procedure got an electric leg, and sales showed that customers liked this innovation, the first in the single-cylinder dual-sport world. This 600 grew into a 650 in ’87, and the gas tank grew to 6.1 gallons. This was followed by the brief one-year appearance of the Tengai version in 1990, essentially a restyling of the standard KLR with a Paris-Dakar look and a bigger fairing. These bikes were directed at riders of modest accomplishments who liked to ride 50 miles to a national forest and then potter along dirt roads for half a day.”

Read about the first-gen KLR in “Re-Cycling: 1987-2007 Kawasaki KLR650”

Rider’s first test of the Kawasaki KLR650 was a three-bike tour test comparison published in the April 1989 issue.

Salvadori was on hand for the KLR650’s first test in Rider, a three-bike tour test comparison with the Honda Transalp and BMW R100GS published in the April 1989 issue, two years after the KLR650 was introduced. (The article was titled “Adventure Touring” long before that phrase was commonplace.) With Editor Mark Tuttle and Technical Editor Bob Price in tow, Clem led the gang through Death Valley–up Goler Wash, out to Aguereberry Point and through Emigrant Canyon–back when the area was still a national monument (it became a national park in 1994). The KLR proved to be the best off-road bike of the three thanks to its generous low-end torque, 9.1 inches of suspension travel and comparatively low weight. On the road, however, its 651cc single was buzzy (despite having dual counterbalancers) and its front brake was woefully underpowered. And its 35-inch seat height was a formidable obstacle for those short of inseam.

In the years that followed, Rider selected the KL650 Tengai as the “Top Adventure Touring Motorcycle” (May 1990 issue) and published touring features in which the KLR650 played a leading role (“Dirty Duo,” August 1993; “A KLR in Color Country,” May 1995). The KLR soldiered on, selling well and building a loyal following.

Rider published its first solo test of the KLR in the November 1997 issue, written by Arden Kysely. Having gotten the formula right out of the gate, the KLR underwent few changes during its first two decades. A rare round of updates for the 1997 model year were limited to a lighter flywheel, an extra clutch plate and a more conservative color/graphics package. About the KLR’s brakes, Kysely penned this memorable line: “…the front and rear discs muster all the enthusiasm of a teenager cleaning his room.” Weak brakes aside, he praised the KLR for its affordable price, good midrange power and torque, nimble handling, ample range, comfortable seat and ability to carry lots of gear.

Arden Kysely 1987 Kawasaki KLR650
Arden Kysely poses with his 1987 KLR650 among the rocks of California’s Mojave Desert on his way home from a 1995 Utah adventure ride.

With fond memories of his years, miles and adventures on KLRs (he put 40,000 miles on his 1989 KLR and 25,000 on his 1997 KLR), Kysely had this to say: “The KLR is no beauty queen, lacks modern electronic rider aids and won’t win many drag races, but there’s no better bike for newbies and veterans on a budget to take exploring. The KLR is for riders who want to enjoy the country they’re riding through, not just blast through to check another route off the list. And it’s the ultimate workhorse–just keep it shod and fed and a KLR will be your faithful companion on many adventures. Compared to more modern bikes, this one-lung adventurer may seem lacking, but it’s simplicity and ruggedness are virtues not found in the high-dollar machines.”

Read Arden Kysely’s “The Arrival: A Tale of the Sierra Madre on KLR650s”

With so many KLRs on (and off) the road–by some estimates, nearly 150,000 were produced–the venerable dual-sport fueled a veritable cottage industry in the aftermarket. In the May 1999 issue of Rider, EIC Tuttle wrote a project bike feature called “King KLR.” Starting with a stock 1998 KLR650, he upgraded the suspension (including an Öhlins shock), handlebar, seat, exhaust, clutch, tires and various odds-and-ends, such as the infamous “doohickey,” the name the KLR community gave to the notoriously failure-prone “balancer chain adjuster lever.” He also swapped the steel gas tank for a lighter plastic one (being translucent, it also provided a low-tech fuel “gauge”) and added hand guards, a taller windscreen, cleated footpegs, a centerstand, a skid plate and soft luggage.

Rider May 1999 King KLR KLR650 project bike
EIC Tuttle’s extensive KLR650 upgrade project was summarized in his feature “King KLR” in the May 1999 issue of Rider.

Having turned the KLR into a more comfortable and versatile adventure tourer, he bought the bike from Kawasaki and kept it in his garage for more than a decade, occasionally using it for two-up camping trips with his wife, Genie. Looking back, Tuttle muses: “Since 1987 the primary benefit of the KLR650 has also been its biggest weakness: size and comfort. Though far lighter than contemporary liter-class ADV bikes, compared to most dual-sport 650 singles the KLR is heavy and has less ground clearance, so it can be a handful in sand and on big hills. At a Jeep-like pace it tackles moderate single-track trails and fire roads just fine, though, and its bigger seat, road-hugging weight and liquid-cooling make it a far better companion on long road rides than its air-cooled competitors.”

Kawasaki KLR650 Mark Tuttle
Rider EIC Mark Tuttle and wife Genie embarking on a camping trip on the 1998 “King KLR” replete with Acerbis front disc and hand guards, IMS tank and Happy Trails panniers. No one ever told said you can’t ride off-road two-up, so they often did on that trusty KLR, though sometimes Mark asked Genie to dismount and hike some of the gnarlier bits.

Tuttle continued: “My most memorable KLR650 experience was road-racing one on a 150-mile white-knuckled sprint from Ensenada to San Felipe in Baja, Mexico, a La Carrera homage probably put on by the late great Loyal Truesdale. Even though the road was closed and the bike topped out at the ton, I lost count of the close calls after the fifth burro encounter….”

When I joined the Rider staff in 2008, I convinced EIC Tuttle to let me borrow his kitted-out KLR for an adventure-bike ride with a group organized by our local BMW dealer. After borrowing it a couple more times, scratching it up and developing a genuine fondness for the KLR, I pestered Tuttle for months to sell it to me. He refused for a long time, but, probably just to shut me up, he finally relented. Most of my buddies rode expensive BMW GSs, but I loved my low-tech KLR.

Greg Drevenstedt Kawasaki KLR650
Senior Editor Greg Drevenstedt is all smiles during his first ride on King KLR in California’s Los Padres National Forest.

Thanks to the KLR, I learned how to ride a big dual-sport/adventure bike, tackling sand washes and technical hill climbs, crashing more times than I’d care to admit. I referred to my KLR as the Mountain Goat because it would go just about anywhere…not particularly fast, but it was a trooper. And riding the KLR wasn’t “work.” I didn’t have to worry about damaging a test bike or evaluating the bike I was on, so I could just ride for riding’s sake. Riding the KLR on national forest roads and trails throughout the Angeles, Los Padres and Sequoia national forests and all over the Mojave Desert reminded me of my high school days, when I would explore trails on my mountain bike. And I met a lot of great people on group rides, several of whom are some of my best friends to this day.

Kawasaki KLR650 Cameusa Peak
Providing access to views like this, from atop Cameusa Peak in California’s Los Padres National Forest, is what makes the KLR650 such an endearing motorcycle.

King KLR and I had eight good years together, but the reality was that it spent much more time parked in the garage than it did out on adventures, and today’s ethanol-blended gas (and my neglect) took its toll on the fuel petcock and the tiny jets in the carburetor. With a twinge of sadness, I sold it to a good friend–the very same guy who led the first and many of the best rides I had on the KLR. It’s still in the family, so to speak, and I think of that bike every morning when I drink coffee out of my KLR650 mug.

Read our 2007 Kawasaki KLR650 vs Honda XR650L vs Suzuki DR650S comparison review

The KLR got its first and only major update for the 2008 model year, with engine tweaks for smoother and stronger power delivery, better suspension and brakes, a more supportive seat and new switchgear and bodywork. Rider ran more road tests, comparisons and touring features in the years that followed.

Read our 2008 Kawasaki KLR650 road test review

Jenny Smith 2009 Kawasaki KLR650
This tricked-out 2009 KLR650 carried Managing Editor Jenny Smith (in her pre-Rider days) on many adventures, including two trips to the Overland Expo outside Flagstaff, Arizona (shown here). As Marketing Director for Twisted Throttle, she outfitted it with full crash protection, soft waterproof luggage, auxiliary LED lights and a custom seat by Steve Gowing.

Managing Editor Jenny Smith, who joined the Rider staff in 2016, owned a second-gen KLR: “As a dedicated sport rider, dual-sport motorcycles were never on my radar–until I moved to Colorado. Suddenly I found myself and my Honda RC51 left behind while my new group of friends hit the myriad of forest roads and trails on weekends. When I expressed interest, they were nearly unanimous: buy a KLR650. I found a bone-stock, low-mileage 2009 at the local dealership and will never forget my first foray off-pavement. We pulled to a stop at the open gate to ‘air down’ (what in the world??), then I followed them into the forest and onto a rollercoaster of a jeep trail, laughing in amazed, unbridled joy as we splashed through puddles, clawed up rocky hills and paused regularly to soak in the scenery. I was hooked, and for the next four years the KLR (soon outfitted thoroughly with crash protection, lights and luggage) was my ticket to some of the most challenging and beautiful rides I’ve ever experienced. I saw what was at the end of those dirt roads, camped in the wilderness, fell down (a lot), picked the bike back up, learned to carry a quart of oil on any long trip and fell back in love with motorcycling.”

Read our 2012 Kawasaki KLR650 vs BMW G 650 GS Sertão comparison review

2014.5 Kawasaki KLR650 New Edition
Playing around in Death Valley on the 2014 Kawasaki KLR650 New Edition. (Photo by Alfonse Palaima)

One of my fondest memories of the KLR was a two-day ride through Death Valley for the press launch of the 2014 KLR650 New Edition, which got firmer suspension, a new seat and new color options. Twenty-five years after the KLR first appeared in Rider, a group of us covered some of the same terrain on bikes that, apart from minor updates, had essentially the same liquid-cooled 651cc single, same frame, same 35-inch seat height and same 6.1-gallon fuel tank. KLRs made in the final years of the production run were certainly better than the early models, but in some ways the KLR has been timeless. And it’s even cheaper now than it was three decades ago.

Read our 2014 Kawasaki KLR650 New Edition first ride review

Back in 1989, when we published our first comparison test featuring the KLR650, its MSRP was $3,499 ($7,164 in 2018 dollars). MSRP for 2018 KLR650s that remain on dealer floors is $6,699, a savings of $465 in current dollars from the 1989 model. But on the Cycle Trader website there are scads of new, 0-mile KLR650s going for less than $6,000, with some even listed for less than $5,000. And if you’re in the market for a used KLR, the possibilities are nearly as limitless as the aftermarket products designed specifically for the crowd-pleasing dual-, er, triple-sport.

Read Clement Salvadori’s exploration of California’s Lost Coast
on a 2014 Kawasaki KLR6750 New Edition

Kawasaki KLR650
Officially it may be the end of the KLR, but the adventures will continue for many years to come.

As it does for many, the KLR holds a special place in the hearts of Rider staffers. Hearing the distinctive tweet from the exhaust of a KLR riding by immediately transports us back to memorable adventures, carefree days and campfire nights.

Will we see the KLR return in a year or two, minimally updated with fuel injection and an emissions-compliant exhaust system (like the KLX250 did)? Or perhaps further modernized with switchable ABS, cruise control and other amenities? Whether or not Kawasaki revives the venerable KLR, its legend is secure as one of the most affordable, reliable, versatile and enjoyable motorcycles ever produced.

 

Source: RiderMagazine.com

2018 Triumph Tiger 800 XCA | Road Test Review

2018 Triumph Tiger 800
For 2018, Triumph offers Tiger 800s in a six-bike lineup, all incorporating extensive upgrades. The top-dog 800 XCA we tested features six riding modes: new Off-Road Pro, Off-Road, Road, Sport, Rain and a Rider-Customizable mode, as well as programmable power levels, traction control, ABS intervention and more. Even better, the core mechanicals perform delightfully well too…. Photos by Kevin Wing.

In a world flush with outstanding large adventure bikes displacing 1,200cc and more, the Triumph Tiger 800 presents a convincing argument for middleweights. We sampled 2018’s top-of-the-line off-road-oriented XCA Tiger 800 variant, which boasts more than 200 upgrades compared to the prior edition; it’s now brimming with high-tech features that deliver a ton of versatility and convenience, along with a load of thoughtful, real-world enhancements.

To some, the engine with its newly added six riding modes may deliver the biggest surprise. Refinements include a new, lower first-gear ratio for more rapid engine response, while the torque curve remains flat as can be for an impressive power hit. This engine is a runner and it builds revs with a vengeance, starting with a raspy snarl that develops into a wild-animal howl in an eager, cammy rush. It’s only during top-gear roll-on passing that the missing 400 or 500cc become apparent, so just downshift!

2018 Triumph Tiger 800Otherwise, the 800 delivers all it’s got in a seamless manner that makes riding a delight. Fuel metering, throttle response, driveline lash, gearbox action, gear spacing and clutch actuation are all practically perfect, so glitches don’t intrude on the riding experience.

Our main complaint concerns engine heat that grows painfully toasty in stop-and-go traffic when air temps climb above 80 degrees, especially on the left side where hot air flows from the radiator onto the rider’s left leg virtually unimpeded. Also, a light buzz builds in the handlebar near 70 mph, then smoothes out at higher speeds; part of this is due to vibration harmonics in the handguards, a quirk common to many ADV and dual-sport bikes.

2018 Triumph Tiger 800

Ken’s Gear
Helmet: Shoei Hornet X2
Jacket: Cortech Sequoia XC
Pants: Aerostich AD-1
Boots: TCX Air Tech

The longish 60.8-inch wheelbase lends stability, while rake and trail figures of 23.4 degrees/3.7 inches make for light, quick steering, especially given the wide handlebar and narrowed cross-section of the 21-inch front tire. A very intuitive partner, the Tiger dances beautifully down twisty roads.

Super-aggressive riding will get the front tire howling sooner than would be the case with a 19- or 17-incher due to the reduced contact patch, but all in all, it’s a non-issue for the vast majority of sporting street riding. It’s also quite comfortable for highway travel, and the new left-side cruise control button proves a welcome convenience.

2018 Triumph Tiger 800
Lots of backlit controls, including a clever mini-joystick, mount on the left side for easy access.

New dual Brembo front brakes deliver strong stopping power and excellent feel. These twin-piston-caliper binders offer a softer initial bite compared to super-aggressive
supersport brakes, but you wouldn’t want racetrack-style braking when you’re in the dirt anyhow. We did notice the slimmer tire tends to nibble a bit while running along on freeway seams or rain grooves, but it’s a minor quirk that you’ll ignore in time.

Meanwhile, if you’re really going to get serious about off-road adventuring, the front wheel will accept DOT-approved knobby tires (tubes required) that will perform much better in the dirt, albeit at the cost of pavement performance. For hard-core dirt adventurers, the XCA now adds a sixth riding mode, Off-Road Pro, so riders can turn off the ABS and other systems for total control.

2018 Triumph Tiger 800
The 21-inch front wheel, WP fork and dual twin-piston Brembo brakes all add to ADV functionality.

The excellent WP suspension feels firm yet compliant, and I am no lightweight. Extra off-road-oriented travel means the Tiger 800 sucks up bumps, patches and holes with ease on neglected back roads with old, broken pavement; no spine-jarring hits here, yielding a huge advantage over sportbikes and naked bikes that would struggle with less suspension travel.

Seating is upright and spacious and the seat can be altered between 33.1 inches or 33.9 inches in mere seconds. I chose the taller position to appease my aging knees, and the longer reach to the ground didn’t present any problems for me with my 31-inch inseam. The seat is wide and firm although not cushy comfortable.

2018 Triumph Tiger 800
A new, well-designed windscreen can be easily set to any of five positions using one hand.

A new one-hand-adjustable, spring-loaded windscreen is ingenious in design and easy to alter while underway. In the lowest of five positions the oncoming windblast strikes this six-footer right about eyebrow level, and the clean airflow creates little curl-back or buffeting. Despite their modest size, the windscreen and deflectors redirect windblast away from the rider’s torso well, producing a decent still-air pocket.

2018 Triumph Tiger 800
Riders may choose between six styles of displays for the easy-to-read, full-color, 5-inch TFT instrument screen.

The new 5-inch, full-color TFT instrument panel stays easily readable day or night, with nice levels of contrast; the readout configuration can be custom selected to suit rider preference. Lots of the backlit switchgear has been moved to the left side of the handlebar, including a five-way joystick that greatly simplifies navigation through the many riding mode/display menus.

However, the joystick on our bike proved to be a bit sticky, locking in place until manually returned to center; hopefully this glitch is unique to our test bike, as this innovation makes it quick and easy to navigate through the plentiful mode options.

2018 Triumph Tiger 800
Comfy ergonomics can be adjusted for seat height and handlebar position. Riders headed off-road will appreciate the XCA’s 21-inch front wheel, but all Tiger 800s shine brightly on old busted-up back roads.

When balancing the scales, whatever edge the Tiger 800 trades away in cubic inches and punch compared to big ADV bikes, it gains back in more nimble handling, easier slow-speed maneuvering and better off-road manners thanks to a 35- to 80-pound weight savings. In short, this middleweight hits that sweet spot right in the middle. And for the Triumph Tiger 800, that’s a very good place to be.

2018 Triumph Tiger 800
2018 Triumph Tiger 800 XCA.

Check out Rider’s guide to new/updated street motorcycles for 2019!

2018 Triumph Tiger 800 XCA Specs

Base Price: $12,000 (XR model)
Price as Tested: $15,850 (XCA model)
Warranty: 2 yrs., unltd. miles
Website: triumphmotorcycles.com

Engine

Type: Liquid-cooled, transverse in-line triple
Displacement: 799cc
Bore x Stroke: 74.0 x 61.9mm
Compression Ratio: 11.3:1
Valve Train: DOHC, 4 valves per cyl.
Valve Insp. Interval: 12,000 miles
Fuel Delivery: Fuel injection w/ throttle-by-wire, 44mm throttle bodies x 3
Lubrication System: Wet sump, 4.3-qt. cap.
Transmission: 6-speed, hydraulically actuated wet clutch
Final Drive: Chain

Electrical

Ignition: Digital inductive
Charging Output: 476 watts max.
Battery: 12V 11.2AH

Chassis

Frame: Tubular-steel trellis w/ engine as a stressed member, cast aluminum alloy swingarm
Wheelbase: 60.8 in.
Rake/Trail: 23.4 degrees/3.7 in.
Seat Height: 33.1/33.9 in.
Suspension, Front: 43mm USD fork, adj. for rebound & compression damping, 8.7-in. travel
Rear: Single shock w/ remote reservoir, hydraulically adjustable preload, 8.5-in. travel
Brakes, Front: Dual 305mm floating discs w/ 2-piston pin-slide radial calipers & switchable ABS
Rear: Single 255mm disc w/ 1-piston pin-slider caliper & switchable ABS
Wheels, Front: Spoked, 2.15 x 21 in.
Rear: Spoked, 4.25 x 17 in.
Tires, Front: 90/90-21
Rear: 150/70-R17
Wet Weight: 505 lbs. (as tested)
Load Capacity: 998 lbs. (as tested)
GVWR: 493 lbs.

Performance

Fuel Capacity: 5.0 gals., last 1.1 gals. warning light on
MPG: 87 PON min. (low/avg/high) 46.1/47.0/49.3
Estimated Range: 235 miles
Indicated RPM at 60 MPH: 3,400

Source: RiderMagazine.com

2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE | First Ride Review

2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE
The 2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE is a fully off-road-capable motorcycle with classic retro styling. (Photos by Kingdom Creative)

Scramblers are hot right now, with well over a dozen models available from five different manufacturers. With rough-and-ready retro styling, the appeal of scramblers–that freewheeling, desert-racing spirit of the ’60s, embodied by the King of Cool himself, Steve McQueen–is hard to deny. Most modern scramblers, however, are street-oriented models that talk the talk more than they walk the walk of off-road capability.

Triumph’s Hinckley-era, Bonneville-based scramblers, starting with the air-cooled, 865cc Scrambler produced from 2006-2016 and continuing with the liquid-cooled, 900cc Street Scrambler, are more suited to pavement than dirt. But that changes with the introduction of the Scrambler 1200. Rather than just a styling exercise built around the larger 1,200cc parallel twin, Triumph created a full-on adventure bike with classic minimalist styling. No windscreen, no bodywork, just a steel tank, a wide handlebar and a round headlight.

Read our 2019 Triumph Street Scrambler first ride review

2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE
The 2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE has the classic scrambler look, with swept-back high pipes, a skid plate, spoked wheels and a round headlight.

I’ll admit, when it was announced last October, I was skeptical that the Scrambler 1200 would be truly capable off-road. Sure, it has some impressive specs–tubeless spoked wheels with a 21-inch front, nearly 10 inches of suspension travel on the higher-spec XE model, fully adjustable Öhlins rear shocks and an Off-Road ride mode–but I expected it to be a handful in the dirt. On the first day of the press launch, hosted at Wim Motors Academy, an off-road training facility in rural southwestern Portugal, we were told to “warm up” with a few laps on a dirt oval cut into sloping field–under the watchful eyes of a photographer and a videographer. No pressure.

2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE
They won’t be fitting me for a steel shoe anytime soon, but turning laps on a dirt oval gave me confidence in the 2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE’s off-road ability.

Doing my best impression of a flat track racer, I scooted forward on the seat, weighted the outside peg, stuck out my left leg and went for it. After the first tentative lap, I used the throttle more assertively, spinning the rear wheel and letting the bike rotate beneath me. Plenty of torque was on tap, and in Off-Road mode it was easy to manage and the traction control–which is programmed to allow more rear-wheel spin when hard on the gas–allowed the tail to kick out for power slides without going too far. By the third lap, I was hooked!

Greg’s Gear
Helmet: Bell Moto III
Jacket: Rev’It Zircon
Pants: Reax Ridge
Boots: Sidi Scramble

2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE
Gravel, dirt, sand, mud–the Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE takes it all in stride. Even at a fast pace, it felt planted, stable and confident off-road.

My veins pumping with confidence and adrenaline, our five-bike group took off on a loop ride on unpaved roads between farms and through forests. I was amazed at how easy it was to ride the Scrambler 1200 XE off-road, how planted it felt on uneven terrain and how forgiving it was of ham-fisted inputs and the abuse that comes from hammering rough roads at a fast pace. The Scrambler’s lack of a windscreen and bodywork reduced the sense of visual mass from the cockpit, making the bike seem smaller than it actually is. Its weight–a claimed 465 pounds dry; probably around 500 pounds ready to ride–felt nicely balanced, and the well-padded, vinyl-covered bench seat made it easy to move around. Gravel, hard pack, sand, mud–we blitzed through it all, got filthy dirty and had fun in a way that only carefree motorcycling can provide.

2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 XC XE
Two versions of the 2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 are available, the higher-spec, more off-road-capable XE (left) and the base-model XC (right).

Knowing that adventure riders segment themselves into two groups–those who ride primarily on the street but enjoy occasional off-roading, and those who prefer to ride off-road as much as possible–Triumph created two versions of the Scrambler 1200. Aimed at the first group, the base-model XC has 7.9 inches of suspension travel, a lower 33.1-inch seat height, a narrower handlebar, a shorter wheelbase, tighter steering geometry, five riding modes (Sport, Road, Rain, Off-Road and Rider customizable) and switchable ABS and traction control. Aimed at serious off-roaders, the XE has 9.8 inches of suspension travel, a 34.25-inch seat, a wide adjustable-height handlebar, multi-mode cornering ABS and traction control, a sixth riding mode (Off-Road Pro), hand guards and heated grips.

Read our 2019 Triumph Speed Twin first look review

2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE engine
For the Scrambler 1200, the liquid-cooled, 1,200cc parallel twin shared among the big Bonnevilles got a high-power tune and other upgrades. Claimed output is 90 horsepower and 81 lb-ft of torque.

Both are powered by a revised version of the liquid-cooled, 1,200cc, SOHC, 8-valve parallel twin shared across most of the Bonneville family. The Scrambler 1200s get a “high power” version of the engine with a dedicated scrambler tune that generates a claimed 90 horsepower at 7,400 rpm and 81 lb-ft of torque at just 3,950 rpm. Other engine tweaks include lightweight balance shafts, engine covers and cam cover, a low-inertia crankshaft, a lighter alternator and a revised clutch assembly, and it is held in place by a dedicated tubular-steel frame with aluminum cradles. To keep the Scrambler’s high pipes tucked in Triumph used a single throttle body assembly, and the pipes curve inward above the footpegs for a narrow profile between the knees when standing up. Thanks to the high-performance tune and 270-degree crank, the brushed stainless-steel twin pipes emit a throaty bark. However, even with their heat shields, the pipes get very hot after spirited riding due to the integrated catalytic converter.

2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE TFT display
The Scrambler 1200’s full-color TFT instrumentation has two themes (Cronos, shown, and Quartz), high- and low-contrast options and customizable displays. Oddly, though, it doesn’t provide ambient temperature.

The Scrambler 1200 may have classic curb appeal, but it’s modern through and through, with throttle-by-wire, a full electronics package, cruise control, an assist-and-slipper clutch, a customizable TFT display, full LED lighting, keyless ignition, a USB charging port and an optional tire-pressure monitoring system. An accessory Bluetooth module provides turn-by-turn navigation, phone and music functions, and GoPro integration, allowing a paired camera (sold separately) to be operated using the bike’s switchgear.

2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE
Standard fitment on the Triumph Scrambler 1200 are Metzeler Tourance 90/10 adventure tires, but it’s also approved for Pirelli Scorpion Rally knobbies.

Fitted with Pirelli Scorpion Rally knobbies for the off-road test, I kept the XE in Off-Road mode, which adjusts throttle response, traction control and ABS (turning it off at the rear wheel). Off-Road Pro mode turns ABS and TC off completely, but I’m not a pro so I prefer the peace of mind of an electronic safety net, especially with superbike-spec Brembo M50 Monobloc 4-piston radial front calipers pinching 320mm discs. With a radial master cylinder and Brembo MCS front lever, the front brakes were easy to modulate and provided good feedback, but I still wanted insurance against tucking the front due should my enthusiasm outrun my skills. One of the XE’s greatest strengths is suspension performance. With a fully adjustable, upside-down Showa cartridge fork and a pair of fully adjustable Öhlins piggyback shocks, the bike soaked up hard hits from rocks, ruts, dips and even jumps on a motocross track at the training camp, keeping the chassis stable and wheels planted.

2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE
The Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE has throttle-by-wire and six ride modes (Sport, Road, Rain, Off-Road, Off-Road Pro and Rider customizable) that adjust throttle response, traction control and ABS.

Heading out on day two’s street ride, a light drizzle gave way to a steady downpour, giving me a chance to test Rain mode. With throttle response dialed back, cornering ABS and TC cranked up, and Metzeler Tourance 90/10 adventure tires providing good grip, the XE exhibited no untoward behavior. With mostly dry streets after lunch, I switched over to Road and Sport modes and wicked it up. With its 21-inch front wheel and chassis geometry favoring stability over nimbleness, the XE wasn’t exactly flickable, but its wide handlebar provided good leverage and the bike behaved with confidence and certainty. And with a generous amount of torque spread throughout the rev range, I never felt like I was in the wrong gear.

2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE
Riding in a steady downpour gave me a chance to test Rain mode and the bike’s manners in less-than-ideal road conditions. It behaved in a consistent, predictable manner.

In my review of the 2017 Street Triple RS, written after nearly a decade of riding and testing nearly every model produced by Triumph, I made the claim that the British manufacturer’s “greatest unsung virtue is the baked-in user-friendliness that characterizes many bikes in its lineup.” At the Scrambler 1200 launch, I reiterated my opinion to Stuart Wood, Triumph’s Chief Engineer. He smiled and told me that Triumph puts considerable effort into making its motorcycles accessible and predictable, from throttle response to steering behavior, gear changes, braking and so on. They don’t dumb them down to the point of being boring; quite the contrary–most Triumphs are full of character and vitality. Rather they design and engineer motorcycles to respond to inputs in a consistent manner, freeing the rider to be more engaged with the experience than with concerns about what might happen next.

2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE
The Triumph Scrambler 1200 has a comfortable, upright seating position. On the XE, the handlebar and foot controls are adjustable.

At the end of the all-day street ride, even though I was cold and wet and tired, I didn’t want it to end. To me, that’s a measure of a great motorcycle, one that goes beyond being a machine or vehicle and becomes a companion, a time capsule, an object of desire. I’m glad I was wrong. I’m glad the Scrambler 1200 XE wiped the smug look of skepticism of my face and replaced with a big, mud-splattered smile.

Check out Rider’s Guide to New/Updated Street Motorcycles for 2019

2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE
The Triumph Scrambler 1200 is the sort of bike you’ll want to ride from sunrise to sunset.

2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE Specs
Base Price: $14,000 (XC model)
Price as Tested: $15,400 (XE model)
Website: triumphmotorcycles.com
Engine Type: Liquid-cooled, transverse parallel twin, SOHC w/ 4 valves per cyl.
Displacement: 1,200cc
Bore x Stroke: 97.6 x 80mm
Transmission: 6-speed, cable-actuated assist-and-slipper wet clutch
Final Drive: X-ring chain
Wheelbase: 61.8 in. (as tested)
Rake/Trail: 27 degrees/5.1 in. (as tested)
Seat Height: 34.25 in. (as tested)
Claimed Dry Weight: 456 lbs. (as tested)
Fuel Capacity: 4.2 gals.
MPG: NA

2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE Ohlins shocks
The Scrambler 1200’s dual, fully adjustable Öhlins piggyback shocks work exceptionally well.
2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE front wheel brake
Brembo M50 Monobloc 4-pistion radial calipers are primo binders. Spoked wheels are tubeless.
2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE gas tank
Steel tank is seamless and has a Monza-style filler cap and a stainless steel strap over the top.
2019 Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE seat
Flat bench seat is wide and supportive, and its vinyl cover makes it easy to move around.

 

 

Source: RiderMagazine.com

Re-Cycling: 2002-2012 Suzuki DL1000 V-Strom 1000

Suzuki DL1000 V-Strom 1000
The V-Strom 1000 in the May 2004 issue of Rider.

While their rugged, round-the-world styling and expedition-ready features suggest otherwise, some adventure bikes work better on the road–much better–than they do off pavement. As word of this open secret spreads, they’re being bought more and more by riders who appreciate their overall utility, upright seating and solid aftermarket support.

Suzuki’s original DL1000 V-Strom is one of the standard bearers of the street-leaning ADV bike, striking a balance between RTW looks and performance and streetwise utility that makes it a champ in the bang-for-the-buck sweepstakes today.

Check out our comparison test: V-Strom 650 vs. V-Strom 1000.

Maybe seeing in advance where the market segment was going, Suzuki gave the DL1000 the 996cc L-twin from the TL1000S sportbike, modified for the midrange and low end it needed for low-speed riding and for hauling luggage. The 90-degree cylinder spread technically gives the engine perfect balance, but the rods are slightly offset side-to-side so a little vibration creeps in.

Even more is apparent in some 2002 and early ’03 models, which produced a low-rpm vibration far outside the norm. Called “chudder”–a combination of chatter and shudder–on online forums, it’s curable with an improved clutch basket. Even then, though, the big Strom dislikes being lugged.

Suzuki DL1000 V-Strom 1000
A decent skid plate is a necessity if you plan on taking your Strom off-road. Shown here in the August 2007 issue of Rider.

One big compromise resulting from hanging the TL’s engine from the DL1000’s stout aluminum frame is a worrisome lack of ground clearance. The oil filter, oil cooler and the front cylinder’s header pipe all sit dangerously low and forward enough that a sturdy bash plate isn’t just a fashion accessory, but a necessity for off-roading. On pavement and smooth fire roads the suspension works adequately, but serious trails should be avoided.

It’s much more suited to the street, where small upgrades–a replacement shock and a fork kit–bring big rewards in handling. The brakes are just average, requiring stainless lines and high-performance pads to bring out their best. The 33-inch seat height is a problem for some, making lowering links a hot seller in the aftermarket.

Another aftermarket staple for DL1000 owners is an improved windscreen, because just about anything is an improvement over the stock one, which though stylish is ineffective at reducing buffeting at the helmet level. The fairing, too, deflects some wind but not as much as its appearance suggests.

Suzuki DL1000 V-Strom 1000It’s also an enormous parts bill waiting to happen in case of a fall–every fairing panel’s part number should end with “-$$$.” Fueling issues on some bikes can be cured with a tuning module, while other bikes run cleanly stock. Rough running has also been traced to dirty fuel filters, which many riders simply bypass.

Problems to watch for on used DL1000s include flaking engine paint, rusty or warped brake rotors and corroded hardware. Check the fins on the radiator and especially the oil cooler for damage, and make sure the brake pads don’t stick in the calipers and drag on the rotors.

If there are scratches on the plastic bodywork indicting a fall in the past, check for broken mounting tabs or missing grommets. An often-neglected check is to crawl under the bike and inspect the bottom rear shock linkage for play; the bearings inside are vulnerable to repeated spray from rain and can dry out, causing slop in the suspension.

Prices range from about $3,600 for a first-year DL to around $8,000 for a 2012; factor in accessories and condition accordingly.

Suzuki DL1000 V-Strom 1000
2007 Suzuki V-Strom 1000, as seen in the August 2007 issue of Rider.

2002-2012 Suzuki DL1000 V-Strom 1000

PROS
Big torquey engine, do-it-all versatility, above average reliability.

CONS
Nosebleed seat height, rust and corrosion prone, vulnerable and expensive plastic parts. 

Displacement: 996cc
Final drive: Chain
Wet Weight: 517 lbs.
Fuel Capacity: 5.8 gals.
Seat Height: 33 in.

Source: RiderMagazine.com

2018 Suzuki V-Strom 650XT vs V-Strom 1000XT | Comparison Review

Suzuki V-Strom
The V-Strom 1000 and 650, shown here with the XT packages that include tubeless spoked wheels, have the distinction of being direct competitors despite, or perhaps because of, their different sizes and prices. Which one works better overall? Photos by Kevin Wing.

How does one decide on an adventure-touring bike? All of the choices out there can turn your mind into Play-Doh. One way to narrow them down is by the front wheel size that suits your riding style.

Planning a lot of off-road riding? You need a skinny 21-inch front to carve up the loose stuff and roll effortlessly over ruts and obstacles–you’ll find one on a Honda Africa Twin or Kawasaki KLR650.

No dirt in your future? A 17-inch front wheel will give the bike sharper handling on the street and a good variety of sport-touring tire choices–the Ducati Multistrada 1260, Yamaha Tracer 900 GT and larger Kawasaki Versys models all have 17s up front.

Read our Comparison Review between the V-Strom 650 and Versys 650 LT.

For most of us a compromise is in order. You have dreams of conquering the Atacama Desert or Dalton Highway, but will probably spend most of your time in the lower 48 on paved roads, and about 10 percent on dirt byways and 4×4 trails connecting them. That reality has made 19-inch fronts common among ADV bikes because they’re a (mostly) happy medium between street and dirt.

Now, winnow out the expensive European machines with 19s and the pricey (and kinda heavy) Yamaha Super Ténéré, and you’re left with just two bikes–the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 and 650. That’s a good problem to have, though, because both are extremely competent on-road and can tackle some dirt as well.

You would think that choosing between them would be easy because of their size difference, but there’s actually a long-running debate over which is the better bike overall, largely because the V-Strom 650 is so versatile and a lot less moolah. Rider typically only compares similar bikes from different manufacturers, so we’ve never attempted to resolve the V-Strom 650/1000 debate. Let’s do it!

Suzuki V-Strom
We snagged two Stroms and hit the road for our test, riding a mix of dirt and street to see which Strom rules them all.

For this story Managing Editor Jenny “Slim” Smith and Yours “Gas Hog” Truly planned a long street ride with a chunk of rutted dirt road to close the loop, so we requested the XT variants of the V-Strom 650 and 1000, which are an additional $500. This gets you tubeless spoked wheels that can take some abuse, hand guards with larger bar end weights and an engine cowl on the 650XT. The 1000XT gets the spoked wheels plus a Renthal Fat Bar handlebar; the rest is already standard on the base model. The plastic cowls offer some protection for the vulnerable bits in front (like the oil filter) from stones and debris, but are no replacement for a good skid plate.

Suzuki V-Strom
For 2017 the V-Strom 650’s V-twin received new camshafts to boost power, dual spark plugs for better combustion and Suzuki’s Low RPM Assist and Easy Start System.
Suzuki V-Strom
V-Strom 1000 engine got a power increase in 2014; refinements for 2018 make the 1,037cc, 90-degree V-twin Euro 4 compliant.

Suzuki took things a step further by adding quite functional accessory top and side cases, tank bags, centerstands and “accessory bars,” a.k.a. bash bars, which are a good place to mount things like auxiliary lighting and may help protect the fairing in a tipover. The accessories added $2,636 to the $9,299 retail price of the 650XT and $2,413 to the $13,299 cost of the 1000XT.

At the crux of the big debate between the 650 and 1000 are the similarities between the two machines. Both are powered by liquid-cooled, 90-degree V-twins with DOHC and 4 valves per cylinder, and have six-speed transmissions, chain final drive and the same 14,500-mile valve inspection interval. Engines are mounted as stressed members in twin-spar aluminum frames, which have aluminum swingarms and bolt-on steel seat subframes, and both use the same wheel and tire sizes.

Suzuki V-Strom
Tubeless spoked wheels are part of the XT package and add some authentic looks and toughness. Twin discs up front with 2-piston floating calipers could use more bite.
Suzuki V-Strom
Radial-mount 4-piston opposed brake calipers provide more stopping power and are a useful upgrade on the 1000XT.

Following a major redesign for the 1000 for 2014 and some updates for 2018, and a redesign for the 650 for 2017, the rugged styling and bodywork from their “beaks” in front to the luggage racks/passenger grabrails in back is similar now, and the stacked halogen headlights, instrument panels and LED taillights are identical. Both hold 5.3 gallons of fuel, though the 1000 requires 90-octane premium or better and the 650 is happy with 87.

Riders at opposite ends of the size chart will find this an easy choice, since the 650XT is lighter and lower for the vertically challenged, and the 1000XT has more power and legroom for the Paul Bunyans out there. Unless budgetary concerns are paramount, however, those in the middle have more to mull over.

Riders of almost all sizes own and love their V-Strom 650s thanks to its moderate seat height, 467-pound wet weight (without accessories) and lively engine, which made 68.7 horsepower at 9,100 rpm and 44.2 lb-ft of torque at 6,500 on the Jett Tuning dyno at the rear wheel, though the torque curve is so usefully flat that you have to hunt for the peak. It offers plenty of power for solo touring or two-up day rides, enough that even at 6 feet, 3 inches tall and 220 pounds, contributor Clement Salvadori recently bought one.

Although the 650 feels and looks smaller than the 1000, seating and comfort are similar, with wide tubular handlebars, footpegs well located under the rider and wide, compliant seats that are plenty comfortable from fill-up to fill-up.

Suzuki V-Strom
Profile shots of the author riding the V-Strom 650XT (above) and 1000XT (below) reveal very little difference in seating positions, though the 1000XT’s slightly higher seat gives it a touch more legroom, and its taller adjustable windscreen is quieter. Tubular handlebars on standard riser clamps are easily pivoted and raised for stand-up riding.

Suzuki V-StromThe 1000 has a bit more legroom but its seat is about an inch higher–I can nearly plant my feet on the ground sitting on the 650 but I’m on the balls of my feet on the 1000. Although the 1000’s fairing is ever-so-slightly larger and its toolless 3-position windscreen does a better job of redirecting the wind than the 650’s (which also adjusts but requires tools), for the most part the two bikes provide a similar amount of wind protection. Passenger seating is pretty good, with the nod actually going to the 650 when saddlebags are installed, since its lower footpegs provide more foot and legroom.

Suzuki V-Strom
V-Strom 650XT’s windscreen adjusts to three positions over a 1.5-inch range using tools. Stacked halogen headlight is a bit dim on either beam.

If the V-Strom 1000 didn’t exist, one would find very little to complain about on the 650, but it does and many riders think that bigger is better now. For starters there’s the
additional power; with 91.8 horsepower at 9,100 rpm and 66.2 lb-ft of torque at 3,900–though redline is a touch lower at 9,200 rpm vs. 10,000–the 1000 pulls much harder at high rpm, and there’s roughly a third more torque much lower in the powerband.

Though the bike weighs 44 pounds more, its added engine grunt makes highway cruising and passing (especially uphill) much more relaxed and two-up and fully loaded touring a breeze, and the bike squirts from corner to corner quicker with a lot less shifting. The 1000 also has an assist-and-slipper clutch that eases shifting a little.

Suzuki V-Strom
Instrument panel with analog tach and LCD speedo display includes trip computer, fuel gauge, gear indicator and clock and is common to both the V-Strom 1000XT and 650XT.

In general, however, riding solo on the road we found that the 1000’s draw is less its additional power than it is the bike’s superior suspension and brakes. Rear binders are identical, but in place of the 650’s 2-piston floating calipers up front the 1000 gets radial-mount opposed 4-piston clampers, and a stout, 43mm inverted fully-adjustable cartridge fork on the 1000 replaces the 650’s 43mm standard damper-rod unit.

Rear shocks have convenient remote preload and rebound damping adjustment and the same travel, but the 1000’s beefier shock looks as if it ate the 650’s for breakfast. Both the 650’s quick, light handling and the 1000’s smoother, more neutral feel in corners have their virtues, but we found the 1000 much more stable and planted on bumpy roads and in turns, and its front brakes strong enough for any stopping task where the 650’s are just adequate.

Suzuki V-Strom
Slightly tighter steering geometry and 44 pounds less weight make the 650XT more nimble in tight turns, but the 1000XT’s superior suspension and neutral steering give it an edge in faster bends, especially when it’s bumpy.

Suzuki Motion Track ABS and Combined Braking is also standard on the 1000, which uses a 5-axis IMU to help the ABS work in corners, and proportions braking force front and rear under certain conditions when the front lever is applied. In the long run, though the 650 can get through tight corners quicker and slices up traffic, we preferred the added stability, more predictable handling and braking and better overall ride of the 1000.

Depending upon your personal pucker factor and where you’re riding off-road, climbing on the 650XT after riding the 1000XT in the dirt will either feel like a huge relief or something of a disappointment. Their stock 90/10 ADV tires are comparable, but the 650 definitely has the advantage of less weight and a lower seat height.

Suzuki V-Strom
Although they don’t have as much ground clearance or suspension travel as some of the competition, both the V-Strom 1000XT and “Wee”-Strom 650XT can tackle graded dirt roads or moderate 4×4 byways provided the rider uses some restraint. The 650 is lighter; the 1000 has better brakes and suspension.

While that doesn’t make much difference on graded dirt roads, in sand, tight turns and on hills it inspires more confidence, particularly at the lower speeds most of us mortals will be carrying off-road on these big bikes. But a skilled ADV rider will definitely prefer the 1000’s more robust brakes and suspension, and probably won’t be bothered by the additional weight.

Suzuki V-Strom
2018 Suzuki V-Strom 650XT.

Jenny’s Gear
Helmet: G-Max GM11
Jacket: Rev’It Tornado 2
Pants: Joe Rocket Alter Ego
Boots: Sidi Deep Rain

Switchable traction control systems work well and identically in the dirt on both bikes, with 2 levels and Off, but should the need arise (like encountering a steep dirt downhill) the only way to turn the ABS off on either is by removing the seat and one of the ABS fuses. It only takes a few seconds, and the warning light will remind you to put the fuse back, but switchable ABS should be a standard feature on an ADV bike. DIY switch instructions are readily available online.

So, if it boiled down to owning one of these two bikes and nothing else, with no mods allowed, we ended up choosing the 1000, particularly if only a small amount or no off-road riding is involved. And even if there were a fair amount of dirt in front of us, we’d probably stick with the 1000 and just try to get better at riding it.

Suzuki V-Strom
2018 Suzuki V-Strom 1000XT.

Mark’s Gear
Helmet: Shoei Hornet X2
Jacket: Spidi 4Season H2Out
Pants: Olympia Airglide
Boots: Tourmaster Epic Air

A solo rider can easily make a case for the V-Strom 650’s superior fuel economy, and using the $4,000 saved by purchasing it instead to upgrade its suspension and brakes and buy a few aftermarket bits (like a good skid plate) to ready it for any adventure. But the 1000 is not that much bigger, heavier or taller than the 650, and with its extra power would also handle our two-up touring needs just fine while the 650 struggles with a passenger and full load.

There was a time in these models’ histories when the gap between them was wider and the V-Strom 650 was clearly the better choice. Both of these bikes are hugely competent and fun, but for 2018 the gap has narrowed, and now we think that bigger is better.

2018 Suzuki V-Strom 1000XT / 650XT

Base Price: $13,299 / $9,299
Price as Tested: $15,712 / $11,935 (Top Case, Side Cases, Tankbag, Centerstand, Accessory Bar)
Warranty: 1 yr., unltd. miles
Website: suzukicycles.com

Engine

Type: Liquid-cooled, transverse 90-degree V-twin
Displacement: 1,037cc / 645cc
Bore x Stroke: 100.0 x 66.0mm / 81.0 x 62.6mm
Compression Ratio: 11.3:1 / 11.2:1
Valve Train: DOHC, 4 valves per cyl.
Valve Insp. Interval: 14,500 miles
Fuel Delivery: DFI w/ SDTV & 45 / 39mm throttle bodies x 2
Lubrication System: Wet sump, 3.7- / 2.7-qt. cap.
Transmission: 6-speed, hydraulically-actuated wet assist-and-slipper clutch / cable-actuated wet clutch
Final Drive: O-ring chain

Electrical

Ignition: Electronic transistorized
Charging Output: 490 / 390 watts max.
Battery: 12V 12AH / 10AH

Chassis

Frame: Twin-spar aluminum w/ tubular (or box) steel subframe & cast aluminum swingarm
Wheelbase: 61.2 / 61.4 in.
Rake/Trail: 26.5 degrees/4.4 in. / 25.4/4.2
Seat Height: 33.5 / 32.9 in.
Suspension, Front: 43mm USD fork, fully adj. w/ 6.3-in. travel / 43mm stanchions, adj. preload, 5.9-in. travel
Rear: Linked shock, adj. for spring preload (remote) & rebound damping w/ 6.3-in. travel
Brakes, Front: Dual 310mm discs w/ opposed 4-piston radial calipers & ABS / 2-piston pin-slide calipers & ABS
Rear: Single 260mm disc w/ 1-piston pin-slide caliper & ABS
Wheels, Front: Cast, 2.5 x 19 in.
Rear: Cast, 4.0 x 17 in.
Tires, Front: 110/80-R19
Rear: 150/70-R17
Wet Weight: 515 / 467 lbs.
Load Capacity: 450 / 448 lbs.
GVWR: 965 / 915 lbs.

Performance

Fuel Capacity: 5.3 gals., last 1.2 gals. warning light on
MPG: 91 / 87 PON min. (low/avg/high) 40.8/44.2/47.6 / 47.5/50.5/70.6
Estimated Range: 234 / 268 miles
Indicated RPM at 60 MPH: 3,500 / 4,400

Source: RiderMagazine.com

2019 Triumph Street Scrambler | First Ride Review

2019 Triumph Street Scrambler
The lion’s share of the Street Scrambler’s power bump is in the mid-to-high-end, making highway passes easier and reducing the need to downshift in corners. Photos by Kingdom Creative.

Triumph’s 2017 Street Scrambler, powered by the 900cc “High-Torque” parallel twin used in the Street Twin, rolled into the gap left by the departure of the previous generation Scrambler two years ago. With less weight, more power and a slightly modernized look, it has proven to be a popular choice in Triumph’s modern classic line, and for 2019 it has received a refresh that includes a bump in mid-range power, a new cartridge-style fork and a Brembo front brake.

Read our First Ride Review of the 2017 Street Scrambler here.

As its name suggests, the Street Scrambler is primarily a road-going machine (those looking for more than just light off-roading adventures should give the all-new Scrambler 1200 a hard look), and after riding it and its Street Twin sibling (which received similar changes this year) back-to-back at the press launch in Portugal, the Street Scrambler’s upright, commanding riding position proved to be well-suited to navigating the urban jungle.

Read our First Ride Review of the 2019 Street Twin here.

2019 Triumph Street Scrambler
For 2019, the Street Scrambler gets more power, better suspension and brakes, new ride modes and a light style refresh.

Jenny’s Gear
Helmet: X-lite X803 Ultra Carbon
Jacket: iXS Josy
Jeans: Spidi J&Racing Lady
Boots: Rev’It Royale H2O

With its wide handlebar and footpegs mounted below and a bit forward of the 31.1-inch seat to aid in standing, I found the Street Scrambler fit my 5-foot, 9-inch frame well. Although its new 41mm KYB cartridge fork has the same 120mm (4.7 inches) of travel as before, it has a wider stance and feels just a tad beefier, though not intrusively so. Rear suspension, with 4.7 inches of travel and adjustable for preload only, is unchanged.

At 135 pounds, I weigh less than the “average” rider for whom most bikes this size are sprung, but I could still detect an improvement in rebound damping up front that made for a slightly more plush ride. The rear is still rather harsh, so if it were mine, I’d invest in lighter springs up front and a set of Triumph’s accessory Fox shocks for the back.

2019 Triumph Street Scrambler
A 4-piston fixed Brembo caliper improves upon the old 2-piston Nissin, offering better performance as well as lever feel and feedback.

Performance from the single 310mm-disc front brake has been improved, with an opposed 4-piston Brembo caliper replacing the old 2-piston Nissin unit; a floating 2-piston Nissin still squeezes the 255mm rear disc. The difference is noticeable, with more bite up front and better lever feel, increasing confidence when riding aggressively or in the rain.

The big news, though, is the increase in power, a claimed 18 percent more peak horsepower to be exact, plus a flatter torque curve that delivers in the “real-world” range of 3,500 to 5,500 rpm, achieved via a minor retune and a few lighter bits in the engine–a magnesium cam cover, a lighter crankshaft, dead shafts and the balance shafts that ride on them, a mass-optimized clutch cover and a lighter clutch.

2019 Triumph Street Scrambler
Our first ride aboard the new Street Scrambler took place in beautiful Portugal…where it promptly rained, allowing us a chance to test the new Rain ride mode. Fortunately, the sun came out and we enjoyed this beautiful sunset.

Based on the Jett Tuning dyno results in our Rider Test of the identically-powered 2016 Street Twin, the increase should translate to 62 peak horsepower arriving close to the higher 7,500-rpm redline, with peak torque unchanged at 56.7 lb-ft at 3,200 rpm. The seat-of-the-pants result is a new sense of urgency and more get up and go in the mid- to high-end; on our first ride in the mountains near Lisbon, Portugal, I felt it most noticeably during 40-mph roll-ons and when accelerating out of corners, reducing the need to downshift.

The dual-counterbalanced engine has a bit of a V-twin character infusion thanks to a 270-degree firing interval, with a feather-light assist clutch (with adjustable lever, thank you Triumph!) operating the five-speed gearbox. Despite its dirty overtures, the Street Scrambler is geared fairly tall, and I didn’t find myself missing a sixth gear even cruising at 70 mph on the freeway; I’m guessing most Scrambler buyers aren’t looking to cruise at triple digits anyway. The soundtrack is classic Triumph, surprisingly throaty and with a pleasant amount of burble on deceleration.

2019 Triumph Street Scrambler
It looks the same from the outside, but lighter components in the engine as well as a retune boost peak horsepower by a claimed 18 percent.

Harnessing all this is a smooth throttle-by-wire system with standard 2-channel ABS and switchable traction control, but new this year is the addition of Road, Rain and Off-Road ride modes. Road is the default setting; while Rain softens throttle response and increases traction control intervention, power output is unchanged. Off-Road leaves the throttle map in snappy Road mode and turns ABS and traction control completely off. Rain and Road modes are easily selectable on the fly using a large button on the left switchgear; the bike must be stationary to select Off-Road mode.

Our riding day in Portugal was blessedly sunny, but it had rained for several days prior so we were warned to use caution (and Rain mode) on the shady, twisty mountain roads. It was a double-duty press launch, with Triumph giving us first rides on both the Street Twin and Street Scrambler. We were assigned one model for the morning and one for the afternoon, swapping at lunch as well as the four photo stops, giving us the unique experience of getting to ride these similar yet oh-so-different bikes back-to-back. It quickly became apparent that they are indeed two distinct motorcycles that will likely appeal to different riders, and not just because of their aesthetics.

2019 Triumph Street Scrambler
New instrument features more indicator lights. ABS can be switched off using the Off-Road ride mode.

I started the day on a Street Scrambler, and as I already noted it felt immediately comfortable. Though suspension travel is identical to the Street Twin, the Street Scrambler is fitted with longer springs front and rear that, along with the 19-inch front wheel, contribute to its feel as a larger machine. It’s not my imagination–though it has shed a few pounds since last year the Scrambler is still about 10 pounds heavier than the Twin, and a glance at the spec sheet shows it’s also longer, taller and wider at the bars.

In the morning, when the roads were still quite damp, I kept my Scrambler in Rain mode; because it maintains full engine power, I found the slightly softer throttle response to be easier to modulate as we negotiated the unfamiliar–and often quite bumpy–twists and turns, without feeling too heavily reined-in. As the roads dried out and I swapped back and forth on each bike in Road mode, I found myself appreciating their unique experiences.

2019 Triumph Street Scrambler
Despite its heft (compared to the diminutive Street Twin), I felt quicker and more comfortable on the Street Scrambler.

The Street Twin felt smaller, lighter and surprisingly sporty. Its tubeless Pirelli Phantom Sportscomp tires (rolling on cast aluminum wheels, 18 inches up front and 17 at the rear) were working better on the dry pavement than they had in the morning, and despite the narrow bar I was able to flick the Twin through corners easily.

Yet despite its expanded dimensions and heavy spoked steel wheels (with that larger 19 up front), I felt quicker on the Street Scrambler. Maybe it was the added leverage from the wider bar, and the Metzeler Tourance ADV-style tires were performing very well regardless of road conditions…but it could just be that I was more comfortable. A quick poll of my fellow journalists seemed to support that theory; smaller folks liked the Twin, taller ones the Scrambler.

2019 Triumph Street Scrambler
Giddyup! I like the LED cat’s eye taillight and high-piped attitude of the Street Scrambler.

I really liked the first generation, but as a fun, stylish, accessible scrambler-style ride this new Street Scrambler is even better than before–better enough, in fact, to seriously tempt me into making one my own.

2019 Triumph Street Scrambler
2019 Triumph Street Scrambler in Fusion White.

2019 Triumph Street Scrambler

Base Price: $11,000 (Fusion White)
Website: triumphmotorcycles.com
Engine Type: Liquid-cooled, transverse parallel twin, SOHC, 4 valves per cyl.
Displacement: 900cc
Bore x Stroke: 84.6 x 80.0mm
Transmission: 5-speed, torque assist wet multi-plate clutch
Final Drive: O-ring chain
Wheelbase: 56.9 in.
Rake/Trail: 25.6 degrees/4.3 in.
Seat Height: 31.1 in.
Claimed Dry Weight: 448 lbs.
Fuel Capacity: 3.2 gals.
MPG: NA

Source: RiderMagazine.com